Some considerations regarding ebook readers for academics.

CC BY edans

I’m at the stage of my thesis where I’m having to spend a lot of time reading lots of journal articles in depth. Of course, in this day-and-age, and researching a topic such as ‘digital literacy’ we’re talking PDFs sourced via Google Scholar rather than dusty tomes.

The trouble is that all this is on top of my usual screen time. I remember reading about a guy a couple of years back – I forget who it was now – who went to the opticians and was asked how much time he spent in front of screens.

Oh, about 13 hours.

Per week?

No, per day

I’m not quite up to those levels yet, but I can empathise.

Given this situation, I’m trying to make sure I don’t go blind in my old-age. I try to remember to take breaks, close my eyes for extended periods, and so on. I’m also using one of the best screens available for a laptop in my Macbook Pro. But it’s still not enough. I’m beginning to suffer from glare and I’m concerned about the strain I’m putting on my eyes.

That’s why I’ve started to look at e-readers. To clarify, an e-reader is “an electronic device that is designed primarily for the purpose of reading digital books and periodicals and uses e-ink technology to display content to readers” (Wikipedia). Screens using e-ink use virtually no power when ‘on’, drawing electricity only when ‘turning the page’ or navigating menu functions.

Not only does a TFT screen constantly refresh, but it has a lower pixel density (measured in Pixels Per Inch – or PPI) than a screen using e-ink. As this page on Wikipedia shows, the PPI of my 15.4″ Macbook Pro is 110, whereas e-ink screens are anywhere from 167 up to 200 PPI. A standard 1024×768 monitor could be as low as 75 PPI.

This is what that looks like in practice (courtesy of this blog post on The Reader):

So, given that all e-reader screens that use e-ink have spectacular PPIs the academic looking for the perfect e-reader is left with the following considerations:

  1. PDF support
  2. Large enough screen to prevent having to ‘reflow’ every article manually*
  3. Ability to annotate/make notes
  4. Portability
  5. Cost

Things I (and probably most academics) don’t care about:

  • MP3 playback
  • 3G access to app/ebook stores
  • Secondary colour screen

In the UK we don’t have the luxury of having a multitude of e-readers available to us. In fact, it pretty much comes down to a choice between ordering an Amazon Kindle from Amazon US or walking into somewhere like Waterstone’s or WH Smith and buying either a Sony Reader or an Elonex E-Reader. I did also find the iRiver Story on the Play.com and WH Smith websites. The iPad, needless to say, is a non-starter as it has a TFT screen…

But then, from left-field, comes the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) XO machine. It has an innovative ‘transreflective’ screen with a PPI of over 200. In colour. Whilst this E-Book Reader Matrix is useful (as is this review of the Kindle by an academic), sometimes you need to create your own checklist:

E-Reader comparison

It’s a difficult choice. I love Sony stuff, and iRiver things are usually very innovative. The Kindle’s had rave reviews. However, I’ve very kindly been offered the loan of an OLPC XO for a while. It should arrive soon. I shall post a follow-up when I’ve given it a try! 😀

* “Being able to rearrange the text is called reflowing the document and permits a PDF designed for a full sized piece of paper to be easily read on a small devices.” (wiki.mobileread.com)

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Some considerations regarding ebook readers for academics.

  1. I have an OLPC – and lent it to a colleague the other day as part of his eReader session (he was trying to gather as many e.g.s of hardware as he could, as well as discussing the eBooks we have via the library).

    Seemed to go down well with the audience. It’s also likely to survive best if you decide to read in the bath & drop it!

  2. To my knowledge “reflow” is actually a feature of the reader software e.g. in order to take advantage of PDF reflow for the Sony pocket reader you must have the latest firmware. Earlier Readers need a bigger screensize but newer ones should handle PDFs better (though I’ve never used one!)

  3. I have been mulling over this issue for about 6 months now and go back and forward between some dedicated ebook reader and some for of slate…

    The problem for me is that a lot of the academic papers I read are really scans (which have been OCR’ed) not usually by me, or complex documents which won’t reflow nicely. This means that any reader need to be large enough to display most of an A4 page in one go…

    This is where the problems start for me – An ebook reader that size will cost over £500 for a single use object and anything smaller is likely to be frustrating to use and cause more eye-strain for me (in terms of reflow issues and diagrams being too small etc) then reading of a TFT screen.

    My plan at present is to try an iPad coupled with something like Aji Annotate to mark up the PDFs (http://www.ajidev.com/ and a good YT demo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8GX5lzcpsA)

    I’m not convinced that for me at the moment the eye-strain issues are significant and recent studies (http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/do-e-readers-cause-eye-strain/) cast some doubt over whether eink is actually significantly better for eye-strain then LCD etc…

    If you find something that works for you though let me know…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s